Having finished Dylan's Chronicles, Vol. 1, I must report that the boy can write prose. I still haven't gotten 'round to Tarantula, which didn't seem to convince anyone that Dylan's genius extended beyond songwriting. What a pleasant surprise that his new book captures a quirky, distinctive voice that is recognizable to anyone who loves his songs.
This is about the least self-serving autobiography I've read. Sometimes its openness is shocking, as when he conveys in excruciating but ultimately liberating detail the self-doubt he experienced while creating Oh Mercy. Other times, it is more sly and inscrutable. At first glance, he doesn't resolve any puzzles in the lyrics; you wouldn't expect him to telegraph who inspired "Ballad of a Thin Man," and he doesn't. In fact, it's hard to find references to any of the songs, and the book is no worse for it: Dylan is nothing if not respectful of the role that mystery plays in art. But he does drop some understated clues, as when he mentions off-handedly that he and girlfriend Suze Rotolo lived on 4th Street, which I suppose hardcore Dylanologists always knew.
Dylan's eye for detail and character development are impressive, and there's a near-total absence of score-settling passages. (One notable exception is the depiction of Robbie Robertson as a starfucker, which is too unflattering to have been accidental.) For someone with a reputation of irascibility, he has only praise for contemporaries and, especially, the performers from whom he borrowed to build his own persona. Dave Van Ronk comes across as a giant; you can sense Dylan's awe, even as he acknowledges the lack of ambition that kept Van Ronk from the big time. He describes lovingly how John Hammond exposed him to Robert Johnson, whose recordings at the time were virtually unknown. Hammond passed Dylan an advance copy of King of the Delta Blues Singers, which had an influence on him that tends to be understated, evidently, in spite of the major hint he dropped on the cover of Bringing It All Back Home. Decades later, Dylan saw the film footage that surfaced several years ago, purportedly showing Johnson in performance on a Mississippi street; Dylan has no doubt it was the Man, though experts claim it wasn't. In writing about Johnson's songs, he stresses their deep poetics, which tend to get overshadowed by their guitar playing.
More to come . . .
In lieu of an actual post by VC, here is a link to former CBS exec Shaun Considine's reminiscence of how "Like a Rolling Stone" very nearly didn't get released as a single.
And in case you didn't hear, Dylan will be on 60 Minutes this Sunday.
Posted by: VC at December 3, 2004 08:48 AMI just started reading it. It's interesting, though I'm not quite as taken with his prose as others are. He's writing a lot more "folksier" than I would expect somehow. Simpler. Seems a littled mannered, though I suppose no one should be surprised by now that Dylan would be constructing his image -- when has he not been? :-)
Posted by: Jim at November 16, 2004 08:25 PMI bought it, but won't be cracking it open until thanksgiving weekend. so, no spoilers please!
Posted by: deano at November 12, 2004 09:41 AMWith the extremely detailed descriptions of long-ago places and things, I think he's going for the Proustian "madeleine" or Wordsworthian "spot in time" bit. Okay, I've got nothing.
Mostly, I'm testing to see what's wrong w/ the comments. Sorry 'bout that.
Posted by: VC at November 11, 2004 06:43 PMI'm only half way through it, but my impression is somewhat different. I'm enjoying the hell out of it but I don't really believe a word of it. It's beautiful prose but either the guy has the world's best memory for elaborate detail or the details are just that, beautiful prose. I'm voting for the latter.
Posted by: mrw at November 11, 2004 09:14 AMAdvice on Tarantula - don't. It won't make you happy, and life's too short.
Posted by: Linus at November 10, 2004 02:31 PM