My heart goes out to die-hard Cub fans today. Some of my best friends, as the saying goes . . . They probably wonder how some White Sox fans can take such glee in their neighbors' misery. Peter Gammons of ESPN made an interesting comment after Game Six. He was repulsed by the over-the-top hand wringing about this latest manifestation of "the curse." Forget about the billygoat -- the sportswriters (who should know better) found a scapegoat in that poor sap who did exactly what almost anyone would do in reaching for the ball. Gammons bemoaned how Cub fans' well-documented miseries through the years have become a bigger story than the games and players themselves. The guy is from Boston, so he knows whereof he speaks. All month HBO has run the self-pitying and shoddy "Curse of the Bambino," narrated gravely by Ben Affleck, who has suffered through, oh, 20 years or so of agony in following a team that has been pretty respectable, lack of world championships notwithstanding.
It's the old people whom I feel for, following bad teams for year upon year. When their club implodes as the Cubs did, they know time could literally run out before they get to see a World Series win. In the grand scheme, it doesn't matter, I know. But an undeniable emotional investment results from living in the same city your whole, long life and never getting the kind of gratification that Yankee -- hell, Marlin and Diamondback -- fans can take for granted. It all boils down to class for me, I guess. I empathize with the working stiffs whose hearts broke this week, and I'm pitiless where the fat cats are concerned. Their number is many at Wrigley, and you can spot them as the tv camera pans across the crowd. Elitism is what's ruined baseball, or sports in general, or the whole damn country. A winning team's bandwagon is inviting to people who think nothing of dropping a few grand on tickets or, worse, have corporate contacts to take the tickets as a write-off we all pay for. (I'm going all Molly Ivins here, without the humor . . .) An average blue-collar worker can't afford to take the family out to the game anymore, blah blah.
Anyway, that class consciousness is key to understanding why some of us don't identify as strongly with the Cubs as the Tribune and WGN would indicate. Sure, it's petty as hell. But the media's soft-pedaling of death threats directed at Steve Bartman contrasts with the ridicule directed at White Sox fans after a couple of incidents involving drunken fans in the past two years. To the rest of the country, the Cubs may look like underdogs. But in Chicago, they're the Establishment. Imagine being a fan of the White Sox, a team that plays second fiddle to the worst sports franchise in history. We don't complain as loudly or have such a compelling mythology as Cub and Red Sox fans. We also don't have the studied self-pity. Unfortunately, on rare occasions when the White Sox play in October, you'll see nearly as many rich, scene-making faux fans at Sox Park as at any other winning team's park. And I loathe them even more than I do the Wrigley scenesters, lest you conclude I'm biased.
Posted by Vernam at October 16, 2003 08:10 PM | TrackBackGood theory, Mark. ;^) Back when Wrigley owned the team, they came by their ineptitude honestly, and it was easy knowing whom to blame. Now the faceless corporation takes some of the fun out of hating the Cubs, even as it makes the hatred more justifiable!
Posted by: Vernam at October 23, 2003 09:33 AMI think that winning the World Series might be the worst thing that can happen to the Cubs franchise. They would lose all their cachet. Maybe the owners realize this.
Posted by: Mark S at October 23, 2003 04:57 AMBut the Tigers have won twice in my lifetime, which is inconceivable in Chicago. Do you really think they might move? There should be a law against any of the original MLB teams' moving.
I left out some heavy ammo in the anti-Trib rant. Did you hear the Cubs owners got exposed for running their own scalping agency? True -- they were laundering tickets through a wholly owned subsidiary, which would sell at jacked-up prices ($1,500/seat for primes). This is definitely illegal and could bring sanctions from MLB itself, because each team is expected to split its gate proceeds with the visiting team. They defrauded the other teams and ripped off their fans. Let's play two!
Posted by: Vernam at October 16, 2003 11:15 PMOh, and another thing...
The Cubs also completely lucked out with their pitching. Had the Six Toed Sloth that is Antonio Alphonseca not gotten injured early in the year Dusty would never have even contemplated taking a gamble by giving a journeyman like Boroski the closer's role. He would have stuck with Fonzie and it would have been an absolute train wreck.
Yeah, I know. I have my own blog. Sorry.
Posted by: mrw at October 16, 2003 09:39 PMFirst, I'm glad I'm not the only one who thought "what that hell was that?" after watching "The Curse of the Bambino." Beyond shoddy and full of self woe. I expect more from HBO.
Second, I completely concur with you regarding the out-pricing of Joe Six Pack. I've been to a few games at the Stadium (yes, that's what "we" call it) since moving to the NYC area. The sticker price for my seats? $65 apiece. Beyond absurd.
I find even more fault with the Tribune Co. and the Cubs, though. They know that the fat cats are going to show up at Wrigley regardless of who they trot out there. There's no incentive for them to add a big name who would make a real difference. Let's face it, despite all the hoopla over the Cubs' key additions this year, they pretty much backed themselves into the playoffs. Who really made them a better ballclub? Lofton? Simon? Karros? As we saw when Wood imploded last night it all was the pitching, not the third-tier caliber offensive additions.
Oh, and if you're going to feel sorry for anyone, how 'bout us Tiger fans? See me in twenty years when we're still woeful or, heaven forbid, without a franchise.
Posted by: mrw at October 16, 2003 09:35 PM