[FPSPACE] NASA lies about the impact hazard

[E.P. Grondine]

Hello everyone - 

I'm not here to tell you what you or David what you want to hear. 

Apparently David and a few others here seem to think that the facts will change if you just ignore them, or that they can be "spun". In many regards this is like von Braun's war crimes: the evidence is still there:
http://www.noblis.org/OceanDumpingOfChemicalWeapons.htm

and I'll bet David (and many of you) missed them entirely in your space histories.

Now from what has been recovered from the geological and archaeological record, the fact is that NASA has been understating the impact hazard by 10 times. As a matter of fact, pretty much intentionally lying about it, so as to not interrupt the money going to their present clients. And those clients do their best to continue the lie.

The real experts work unfunded by NASA.

As far as David's current work goes, I still don't have any idea what "astrogeology" is, or why the USGS should be spending any money on it; and I know that the cores from the Carolinas have not been published yet by the USGS, and that they contain impact mega-tsunami data:

http://www.csasi.org/states/nsc/baucom/baucom15.htm

Note the grey sand stratum proceeding Tuscarora emigration into the area, what the excavators phase a "Kay-Stemmed like" Tennessee-Alabama point 
"hardly worth considering".

These cores also contain hurricane data, as well as seismic tsunami data, if they occurred.

You want polite? Then do not lie about the impact hazard.

E.P.


_________________________________________________________________
Hotmail® has ever-growing storage! Don’t worry about storage limits. 
http://windowslive.com/Tutorial/Hotmail/Storage?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_HM_Tutorial_Storage_062009
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.friends-partners.org/pipermail/fpspace/attachments/20090711/149c02b9/attachment.html