[FPSPACE] Fear and Loathing on the Launch Pad
Jens Kieffer-Olsen
dstdba at post4.tele.dk
Thu Apr 30 17:10:52 EDT 2009
-----Original Message-----
From: E.P. Grondine [mailto:epgrondine at hotmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2009 10:28 AM
> > You are not saying that one of the most researched
> > ELEs - the Chicxulub impact - was caused by a comet,
> > are you?
>
> Yes.
> In point of fact, we have a sample of the KT impactor.
> If you image google KT-fossil you should see an image of
> the fossil carbonaceous chondrite (comet) recovered from
> a core.
> In other words, Morrison's impact hazard estimates are a
> "crock" as we say here in the US, and Clube and Napier
> were correct.
Well, well, well, Ed - but you seem to have forgotten to
update wikipedia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicxulub_crater :
"On September 5, 2007 a report published in Nature proposed
an origin for the asteroid that created Chicxulub Crater.
The authors, William F. Bottke, David Vokrouhlický, and
David Nesvorný, argued that a collision in the asteroid belt
160 million years ago resulted in the creation of the
Baptistina family of asteroids, the largest surviving member
of which is 298 Baptistina. They proposed that the "Chicxulub
asteroid" was also a member of this group. The connection
between Chicxulub and Baptistina is supported by the large
amount of carbonaceous material present in microscopic
fragments of the impactor, suggesting the impactor was
a member of a rare class of asteroids called carbonaceous
chondrites, like Baptistina. According to Bottke, the
Chicxulub impactor was a fragment of a much larger parent
body about 170 km (105 mi) across, with the other impacting
body being around 60 km (40 mi) in diameter."
Checking further I learn from
http://spaceknowledge.net/?tag=chicxulub-crater
[...] the team found a 90 percent probability that the object
that formed the Chicxulub crater was a refugee from the
Baptistina family. These simulations also showed there was
a 70 percent probability that the lunar crater Tycho,
an 85 kilometer crater that formed 108 million years ago,
was also produced by a large Baptistina fragment. Tycho is
notable for its large size, young age and its prominent rays
that extend as far as 1,500 kilometers across the Moon.
Vokrouhlicky says, "The probability is smaller than in the
case of the Chicxulub crater because nothing is yet known
about the nature of the Tycho impactor."
--
Jens Kieffer-Olsen
Slagelse, Denmark
More information about the FPSPACE
mailing list