[FPSPACE] the thin, frail thread of space budgets
Keith Gottschalk
kgottschalk@uwc.ac.za
1 Nov 2000 11:52:19 +0200
Dwayne Day wrote:
>"human space exploration is largely an
>aberration, a "Cold War echo" that still resonates, but does not have
>to. It is entirely conceivable that the world could stop sending humans
>into space for several decades before deciding to do so once again. We
>could give up on ISS as not worth the cost and sit on the dirt for a few
>decades before deciding to go again. Right now, the only thing that keeps
>us sending humans up there is the inertia from a dead superpower struggle,
>not science, not the desire to explore, not anything terribly noble in
>itself."
To a political cientist, & Joanne G. as well, this has enough weight as truth to be creepy !
I think another element is that like Antarctic bases, there IS a scientific community interest in it.
Of course, running the South Pole, Bryd & McMurdo Sound bases costs a lot less than the ISS. So let's cheer on 2nd generation RLVs.