Re: STOP-TRAFFIC digest 155

New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Other groups

Subject: Re: STOP-TRAFFIC digest 155
From: Victoria Marinelli (vmarinelli@hotmail.com)
Date: Wed Feb 24 1999 - 11:30:51 EST


[Jyothi, I ask that you post my response as soon as possible. I do have
the individual email addresses for a large group of stop-traffic
subscribers, and I will send this out to them on my own if this
discussion is censored, rather than 'moderated'. I will charitably
assume that you take the latter -- moderation -- rather than censorship
of opposing views, as your true task.]

Can I get clarification on what is good about
>prostitution. I know about 3000 prostitutes that are dying to know.

Thank you Dewayne Brown for these comments. Dr. Sloan's question posted
earlier to stop-traffic: "Haven't we clarified several
times on this list that we do not see prostitution as exploitation in
and of itself..." indicates her belief that she speaks for entire
constituency of stop-traffic. "We" did not "clarify" that. Advocates
for the prostitution of women and children, who dominate apparent
anti-trafficking forums, allege a uniformity of views on prostitution
which does not exist, because it is to their economic and/or personal
advantage. Anti- prostitution activists' views, in messages sent to
stop-traffic, are not always posted to this "moderated", and, I fear at
times, carefully censored forum.

Sincerely,

Victoria Marinelli

______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com


New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Other groups

This archive was generated by hypermail 2a22 : Sun Nov 21 1999 - 20:09:35 EST